2.2.11
Times of India
Sexual offences bill: Govt talks of 2 versions
CHENNAI/NEW DELHI: The ministry of women and child development denied a TOI report that the draft Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Bill, 2010, proposes to permit consensual non-penetrative sex between 12-year-olds. It said the report seems to be quoting provisions of a draft prepared by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights.
In its clarification, the ministry said the draft put up before the cabinet has the age of consent at 16. The proviso to Section 3 of the draft sent to states clearly mentions 16 as the age of consent for any sexual act and in any case of penetrative sexual assault on a child between 16 to 18 years of age, it has to be considered whether consent was taken, it said.
According to TN government sources, NCPCR had earlier recommended lowering the age of consent to 12 years and this was subsequently circulated to various states by the ministry of women and child development. But this version has since been superseded by another draft which retains the age of consent between 16 to 18 as under the Indian Penal Code. It is this draft which has, after consultations with the ministry of law, been sent for cabinet approval.
The move to circulate the draft which lowers the age of consent to 12 has, however, been criticized by child welfare groups. Says Raajmangal Prasad, chairperson of Delhi Child Welfare Committee, ''NCPCR does not have the mandate to send the draft directly to states unless it is its own initiative. The ministry had commissioned NCPCR to draft the bill and it cannot wash its hands of the matter.'' Prasad is also critical of the ministry's secretive ways of drafting legislation.
TOI had quoted Aparna Bhat, an SC lawyer who was part of the drafting committee, as saying that the decision to lower the age of consent for minors was aimed at decriminalizing sexual exploration by children.
Child sexual abuse is a violation of a child’s body as well as of the trust, implicit in a care giving relationship. This violation can have a significant impact on how the child, as a victim and later on as an adult survivor, sees and experiences the world. The effects of child sexual abuse can be damaging but need not be permanent.
February 2, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- Jul 2020 (1)
- Apr 2020 (1)
- Mar 2020 (2)
- Oct 2019 (1)
- Sep 2019 (1)
- May 2018 (1)
- Apr 2018 (1)
- Feb 2018 (1)
- Dec 2016 (1)
- Mar 2015 (1)
- Feb 2015 (1)
- Nov 2014 (1)
- Oct 2014 (3)
- Sep 2014 (1)
- Aug 2014 (2)
- Jul 2014 (2)
- Jun 2014 (1)
- Feb 2014 (1)
- Jan 2014 (1)
- Dec 2013 (2)
- Nov 2013 (8)
- Jul 2013 (3)
- Dec 2012 (1)
- Aug 2012 (2)
- Jul 2012 (2)
- Jun 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (4)
- Apr 2012 (5)
- Mar 2012 (1)
- Feb 2012 (1)
- Jan 2012 (6)
- Dec 2011 (5)
- Nov 2011 (3)
- Oct 2011 (9)
- Sep 2011 (3)
- Aug 2011 (5)
- Jul 2011 (5)
- Jun 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (2)
- Apr 2011 (4)
- Mar 2011 (5)
- Feb 2011 (4)
- Jan 2011 (7)
- Dec 2010 (3)
- Nov 2010 (4)
- Oct 2010 (5)
- Sep 2010 (3)
- Aug 2010 (2)
- Jul 2010 (8)
- Jun 2010 (4)
- May 2010 (3)
- Apr 2010 (5)
- Mar 2010 (5)
- Feb 2010 (3)
- Jan 2010 (6)
- Apr 2009 (2)
- Jan 2009 (1)
- Dec 2008 (3)
- Nov 2008 (1)
- Aug 2008 (3)
- May 2008 (2)
- Dec 2007 (2)
- Nov 2007 (1)
- Oct 2007 (4)
- Sep 2007 (16)
- Aug 2007 (5)
- Jul 2007 (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment